The Neighbors Counted Their Money And Voted Gordon Out
Part 7 · 4 min read ·
The special meeting took place three weeks after the hearing. By then, nobody called it my shed dispute.
They called it the dock money.
An independent accountant had reviewed the waterfront payments, the bank records, and the board approvals. Her report was nine pages long. Ellis put a copy on every chair.
The first page stated the limits of her review. She had checked this project, not every account the association had ever held.
The next pages were enough.
“Total paid was $14,600,” she told the room. “Of that, $3,100 covered documented storm cleanup on the proper association route.”
She turned a page.
“The remaining $11,500 covered the relocated approach, dock design, and promotional material. I found no board approval for those expenses and no member approval for joining a private dock project.”
The room stayed very still.
“The $6,000 in refundable reservations remains untouched,” she added. “Those funds should be returned if the project does not proceed.”
A man in the second row raised his hand.
“I put down two thousand. Gordon told me construction was cleared.”
“Did you get that in writing?” June asked from beside me.
He held up a printed email.
Gordon sat at the front table. His navy vest hung open. There was no large map behind him this time.
“We were building value,” he said. “Some people can't see beyond a tin shed.”
Ruth stood.
“I can see my dues.”
Someone started to clap. She held up her hand.
“Please don't. I want an answer.”
She read from the proposal Ellis had supplied.
“Your company gets twenty percent. Did you tell us that before you spent our money?”
“Management has a cost.”
“That wasn't what I asked.”
I had heard the judge use almost the same words. From Ruth, they sounded tired and personal.
Gordon looked toward me.
“Willa has turned a repair issue into a lawsuit against all of you.”
I stood with my folder against my chest.
“I asked for the document that put my shed on community land. He sent a removal truck instead.”
I set copies of the signed fine decision and the temporary order on the front table.
“I didn't close your path. I didn't ask the court to stop drainage work. I asked to keep my building on my land.”
Ellis showed the room the old route on Pilar's survey. Then he placed Gordon's consent form beside it.
“If we already had permanent access across Willa's strip,” he said, “why were we asking her to grant it?”
Gordon said nothing.
Before voting began, Ellis handed out the latest bank balance. There would be no special charge to make up the dock spending while recovery was being pursued.
“And if we can't collect?” someone asked.
“Then you'll see that problem in the books,” he said. “It won't be buried under storm repairs.”
I watched Ruth read the balance twice. Her shoulders dropped a little. She had been counting grocery money that month. Gordon's waterfront dream had asked more of her than he knew.
The meeting chair explained the removal procedure in our bylaws. We had forty voting households. Members signed in, received numbered ballots, and placed them in a box. Two owners who had no board role counted them at a separate table.
I watched their hands rather than Gordon's face.
Twenty-seven voted to remove him. Three voted to keep him. One abstained. The remaining households had not cast ballots.
The required number had been reached.
The chair read the result twice and asked the secretary to enter it in the minutes.
Gordon took his keys off the ring one by one. He put the association room key down with a sharp click.
“Good luck running anything without me.”
Ellis slid the key toward the secretary.
“We'll start with two signatures on project checks.”
The members elected Ruth to fill the vacancy. The remaining board chose a new president. I declined when someone suggested my name.
“I've had enough turns at a control wheel,” I said.
After the vote, the board canceled the dock project and approved refunds of all three reservations. It ordered the original member path cleared and reopened within the week, with Pilar checking the route first.
The review had cost another $1,600. June wrote $13,100 on her pad: the unsupported project spending plus that fee.
My own legal costs would reach $5,000, including filing expenses. With the survey, my total was $6,250.
“Those are the figures we'll take into settlement,” she told me. “The evidence is strong. He still has to agree, or we continue.”
Outside, one neighbor apologized. Another walked past without looking at me. I did not need to collect every apology before going home.
The next morning, June called about an offer from Gordon's lawyer.
“He'll discuss payment,” she said. “But he wants a clause limiting what you can say about the boundary and the money.”