The Old Engine Number Followed Brent Into A Sworn Deposition
Part 6 · 4 min read ·
Elena put the conflicting disposal form in front of Rusk at his deposition.
It said E-604 had been destroyed two days before Daniel's flight. His signature appeared at the bottom.
The transfer sheet said he had installed that same engine in 826.
"Which record was wrong?" Elena asked.
Rusk asked to speak with his lawyer.
We waited in a room that smelled of fresh carpet. Beyond the glass, a lawn crew blew cut grass off a sidewalk.
I rolled my washer once, caught it, and set it beside my water.
When Rusk returned, he answered questions about the current museum records. On advice of counsel, he declined questions about his own part in the old engine transfer.
Elena didn't argue with him.
She took him through each invoice instead.
"Who prepared these descriptions of archive recovery?"
"Brent and I did."
"What original material did your company recover?"
"We developed a narrative from available sources."
"The bill says you recovered and authenticated original military records. Which records?"
He rubbed his mouth.
"I don't have a list."
Then Elena showed him the museum release with my copied signature.
"Did that page exist in the military archive?"
"Not in that form."
"Who made that form?"
His lawyer asked for another break.
By the end of the afternoon, we had one clear answer. Rusk had made the document that spring. He said Brent had sent him the four-page grounding file and asked him to make a clean page for the grant packet.
"Did Ms. Aponte sign that clean page?"
"No."
The court reporter's keys made a light, steady noise.
I had pictured that answer for weeks. When it came, I didn't feel tall or fierce. I felt the chair under me and realized I had been holding my back stiff all day.
Brent's deposition took place the following week.
He said Rusk had handled technical matters. He said he had trusted the archive. He said he couldn't remember which attachments he had sent.
Elena brought out the email returned through the museum's records request in our case.
It went from Brent's business address to Rusk. My complete recommendation was attached.
The message said: Use her signature page. Funders won't touch an unresolved engine death. We need a clearance in the package.
"Did you write this?" Elena asked.
"It was shorthand."
"For what?"
"Getting the display funded."
He looked at me then.
I looked at the email.
His lawyer asked that further questions about the money wait while he reviewed the criminal inquiry. Elena marked the request and ended the session after setting out the records still owed.
Outside, she told me the old crash and the new fraud could have different legal paths.
"One won't automatically settle the other," she said.
I appreciated that. I had spent enough years inside Brent's version of cause and effect.
The mishap office arranged another interview with Quentin and me. Its reviewer brought copies of the first examiner's images. The damaged section still showed the square casting mark.
"We are having the retained material examined," she said. "We also have your original hold recommendation."
"Why didn't the first review connect them?" I asked.
She opened its evidence summary.
"The fracture was recorded as damage from the accident. They lacked a dated inspection image showing it before flight. Your recommendation wasn't included in the material sent to that examiner."
"And the engine number?"
"The disposal form led them to treat the number on the transfer sheet as an entry error. That was never resolved. It should have been."
She didn't ask us to be pleased that someone had finally noticed. She marked each gap on her copy, then asked Quentin for the next image.
"It was received," I said. "The stamp is on my copy."
"Yes. We see it."
She asked about pressure to launch. I described Brent's visits, his words, and the written urgency request I had received through our shop.
I told her where my memory stopped.
Quentin did the same.
Then he opened his notebook to an entry made the morning I found the crack.
Flight officer advised of hold. Objected to delay. Recommended no release without engine removal and inspection.
He had written Brent's full name beside it.
That evening, I fixed a simulator pedal that had been sticking halfway through its travel. The fault was a bent guide, cheap to replace and hard to see until the panel came off.
Felix left a $14 dinner beside my tools.
"Company expense," he said. "You forgot lunch again."
I was eating when Anita called.
Investigators were at the museum with a warrant for the project's financial records and computers. She had given them the preserved file copies and shown them the access log.
After we hung up, Elena forwarded a second notice.
The military mishap review had formally reopened. At the top of its evidence list sat my signed grounding recommendation, followed by Quentin's original image set.