Vale Asked For Damages And Received A Records Demand
Part 6 · 3 min read ·
I read the $250,000 figure three times.
My pickup was worth $6,800 on a kind day. I still owed $1,940 on a replacement boiler. There was no place in my life for a number like that.
Ruth asked me to bring the whole envelope, including the receipt.
“Being sued doesn't make the complaint true,” she said.
“It makes it expensive.”
“Yes. We'll deal with that part too.”
Her answer was plain enough to help.
We signed a written fee plan. I paid $2,000 from savings. She agreed to spread later bills over time while we sought help from a veterans' legal program.
Anika offered money. I told her I couldn't take it.
“Then take a casserole,” she said. “My pride has fewer rules than yours.”
I took the casserole.
Ruth answered every claim by its number. She denied that I had altered the recording. She attached the fund's correction and requested the records Vale relied on when he said I had left wounded soldiers.
The lawsuit gave her a way to demand documents he had ignored in her first letter.
She asked for his drafts, his messages with Pike and Sutter, and the papers behind the exhibit. Dates mattered now. They had boxes beside them and deadlines attached.
Vale also demanded my machine maintenance logs, claiming I had used work time to plan against him. Ruth objected to the reach of that request. The judge limited it to messages and records about the dispute.
I still had to search my phone and old email.
“Even the ones where I sound angry?” I asked.
“Especially those. Give them to me. We follow the same rules we're asking him to follow.”
There were angry messages to Anika. There were none about changing tape. Ruth produced what the court required. I disliked that part, but I could live with someone reading words I had actually said.
Vale missed the first deadline. His lawyer obtained more time. After another delay, a judge ordered him to produce the records.
It took months. I changed belts. I rebuilt a gearbox. Winter put hard ridges of snow beside the alley's rear door.
Each month, Ruth sent me a bill and a short report. Knowing what had happened kept me from imagining ten worse things.
The expanded charity audit moved on its own track. Celia traced the payments to bank records. She found that Sutter had billed for interviews with soldiers who said he had never called them.
Two supposed interview dates fell during June's hospital stay after a bus accident years later.
June sent her discharge paper with the private medical details covered.
“Apparently I gave a very good interview under anesthesia,” she told Anika.
Of the $40,800 questioned, Celia could support $6,600 in actual travel and work. The remaining $34,200 had false support or lacked the approval the invoices claimed.
The state investigators asked for the full audit. Ruth told us to answer their questions separately and keep our own copies.
Then Vale's messages arrived in the lawsuit.
One from Pike, written before the supper, read: Use the short convoy version. Don't put the September date on the slide. Bell can check that.
Another, from Sutter after our first letter, read: If the reel goes wide, the exhibit invoices go with it. Buy the physical copy and make him certify deletion.
I sat very still.
Ruth turned to the next page.
Vale had replied: He repairs bowling equipment. Offer enough to look generous.
There it was. No need to guess what he thought of me.
“He thought I held a dirty rag,” I said.
“You held the source,” Anika said.
I had held one approved training copy, its signed release, and the names of people willing to speak. That was all. It had been enough to ask the first question.
At Vale's deposition, a court reporter sat beside a little machine that caught every answer.
Ruth placed the two-page statement before him.
“When did you first see June Doss's second page?”
“I don't recall.”
She showed him his initials beside Pike's receipt in a scan from his own file.
“Were those your initials?”
He looked toward his lawyer.
“Yes.”
“Did you tell the fundraiser audience that Mr. Caruso had left wounded soldiers?”
“I may have simplified.”
“Which part was simple?”
His lawyer objected to the wording. Ruth asked it again in a narrower way.
Vale admitted I had returned with wounded soldiers. He said he had believed my delay was disobedience.
“Then why call it abandonment?” she asked.
He had no answer that survived the reporter's machine.
Three days later, his lawyer offered to dismiss the suit if I paid my own bills and said nothing further.
Ruth sent one line back.
“Any resolution must include a public retraction.”